Find answers from the community

Updated 6 months ago

best method to measure the similarity(-score) between two given text/answers?

@kapa.ai best method to measure the similarity(-score) between two given text/answers?
k
i
27 comments
Please stand by @ispan3tz as I search the knowledge base. I normally take about 20 seconds or so. :wave:
----------------------
The best method to measure the similarity score between two given texts or answers in the context of LlamaIndex is to use the SemanticSimilarityEvaluator. This evaluator calculates the similarity score between embeddings of the generated answer and the reference answer.

Here is an example of how to use it:

Plain Text
from llama_index.core.evaluation import SemanticSimilarityEvaluator

evaluator = SemanticSimilarityEvaluator()

response = "The sky is typically blue"
reference = """The color of the sky can vary depending on several factors, including time of day, weather conditions, and location.
During the day, when the sun is in the sky, the sky often appears blue. 
This is because of a phenomenon called Rayleigh scattering, where molecules and particles in the Earth's atmosphere scatter sunlight in all directions, and blue light is scattered more than other colors because it travels as shorter, smaller waves. 
This is why we perceive the sky as blue on a clear day.
"""

result = await evaluator.aevaluate(
    response=response,
    reference=reference,
)

print("Score: ", result.score)
print("Passing: ", result.passing)  # default similarity threshold is 0.8


In this example, the SemanticSimilarityEvaluator only uses response and reference, passing in query does not influence the evaluation. The aevaluate method is used to calculate the similarity score between the response and reference text. The result is an EvaluationResult object, which includes the similarity score and a boolean indicating whether the score passes the default similarity threshold of 0.8.
You can find more details about this in the source ().
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
@kapa.ai how SemanticSimilarityEvaluator works, is it based on coisine-similarity? or how it calculates?
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
The SemanticSimilarityEvaluator in LlamaIndex works by comparing the similarity between embeddings of the generated answer and the reference answer. The embeddings are generated using a model specified during the instantiation of the SemanticSimilarityEvaluator. If no model is specified, it uses a default model from the settings or context.

The similarity between the embeddings is calculated using a function specified during the instantiation of the SemanticSimilarityEvaluator. If no function is specified, it uses a default function based on the specified SimilarityMode. The default SimilarityMode is not explicitly mentioned in the provided sources, but it's typically cosine similarity in many text embedding models.

Here is a snippet of the relevant code from the source ():
Plain Text
class SemanticSimilarityEvaluator(BaseEvaluator):
    def __init__(
        self,
        embed_model: Optional[BaseEmbedding] = None,
        similarity_fn: Optional[Callable[..., float]] = None,
        similarity_mode: Optional[SimilarityMode] = None,
        similarity_threshold: float = 0.8,
        service_context: Optional[ServiceContext] = None,
    ) -> None:
        self._embed_model = embed_model or embed_model_from_settings_or_context(
            Settings, service_context
        )
        if similarity_fn is None:
            similarity_mode = similarity_mode or SimilarityMode.DEFAULT
            self._similarity_fn = lambda x, y: similarity(x, y, mode=similarity_mode)
        else:
            if similarity_mode is not None:
                raise ValueError(
                    "Cannot specify both similarity_fn and similarity_mode"
                )
            self._similarity_fn = similarity_fn
        self._similarity_threshold = similarity_threshold


In the aevaluate method, the evaluator calculates the embeddings for the response and reference, and then calculates the similarity score using the specified or default similarity function:
Plain Text
async def aevaluate(
    self,
    query: Optional[str] = None,
    response: Optional[str] = None,
    contexts: Optional[Sequence[str]] = None,
    reference: Optional[str] = None,
    **kwargs: Any,
) -> EvaluationResult:
    del query, contexts, kwargs  # Unused
    if response is None or reference is None:
        raise ValueError("Must specify both response and reference")
    response_embedding = await self._embed_model.aget_text_embedding(response)
    reference_embedding = await self._embed_model.aget_text_embedding(reference)
    similarity_score = self._similarity_fn(response_embedding, reference_embedding)
    passing = similarity_score >= self._similarity_threshold
    return EvaluationResult(
        score=similarity_score,
        passing=passing,
        feedback=f"Similarity score: {similarity_score}",
    )


Please note that the actual implementation of the similarity function and the embedding model can vary and is not explicitly mentioned in the provided sources.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
@kapa.ai transorm text to BaseNodes?
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
In LlamaIndex, you can transform text into BaseNodes using a node parser. There are different types of node parsers available for different types of data structures, such as HTML, JSON, and Markdown.

Here is an example of how to use the HTMLNodeParser to transform HTML text into BaseNodes:

Plain Text
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
from llama_index.core.node_parser import HTMLNodeParser

# Initialize the parser
parser = HTMLNodeParser()

# Your HTML text
text = "<html><body><h1>My First Heading</h1><p>My first paragraph.</p></body></html>"

# Parse the text into BeautifulSoup object
soup = BeautifulSoup(text, "html.parser")

# Extract nodes from the soup
html_nodes = parser.get_nodes_from_soup(soup)

# Now html_nodes is a list of BaseNodes


In this example, the get_nodes_from_soup method is used to extract nodes from the BeautifulSoup object. The result is a list of BaseNodes.

You can find more details about this in the source ().

Please note that the actual implementation can vary depending on the type of the text and the specific requirements of your application.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
@kapa.ai
text = "Test test test",
how to extract nodes from text?
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
To extract nodes from a text in LlamaIndex, you can use a node parser. For example, you can use the SentenceSplitter to split the text into sentences and each sentence will be a node. Here is an example:

Plain Text
from llama_index.core.node_parser import SentenceSplitter
from llama_index.core.schema import Document

# Your text
text = "Test test test"

# Create a document from your text
document = Document(text=text)

# Initialize the parser
parser = SentenceSplitter()

# Get nodes from the document
nodes = parser.get_nodes_from_documents([document])

# Now nodes is a list of BaseNodes


In this example, the get_nodes_from_documents method is used to extract nodes from the document. The result is a list of BaseNodes.

You can find more details about this in the source ().

Please note that the actual implementation can vary depending on the type of the text and the specific requirements of your application.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
@kapa.ai how to use PairwiseComparisonEvaluator ?
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
The PairwiseComparisonEvaluator in LlamaIndex is used to evaluate the quality of a response versus a "reference" response given a question. It does this by having a Language Learning Model (LLM) judge which response is better.

Here is an example of how to use it:

Plain Text
from llama_index.core.evaluation import PairwiseComparisonEvaluator
from llama_index.llms.openai import OpenAI

# Initialize the LLM
llm = OpenAI(temperature=0, model="gpt-4")

# Initialize the evaluator
evaluator = PairwiseComparisonEvaluator(llm=llm)

# Your question, response, and reference response
question = "What is the capital of France?"
response = "The capital of France is Paris."
reference_response = "France's capital is Paris."

# Evaluate the response
result = await evaluator.aevaluate(
    query=question,
    response=response,
    second_response=reference_response,
)

print("Score: ", result.score)
print("Passing: ", result.passing)  # default threshold is 0.5


In this example, the aevaluate method is used to evaluate the response. The result is an EvaluationResult object, which includes the score and a boolean indicating whether the score passes the default threshold of 0.5.

You can find more details about this in the source ().
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
@kapa.ai the score in example above is 0.5, isn't it too low?
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
The score of 0.5 in the PairwiseComparisonEvaluator example is not necessarily low. The score represents the probability that the LLM judges the first response (the one being evaluated) to be better than the second response (the reference).

A score of 0.5 means that the LLM judges the two responses to be equally good. A score above 0.5 means the LLM judges the first response to be better, and a score below 0.5 means the LLM judges the second response to be better.

In the example, the response and the reference response are essentially the same, just phrased differently. Therefore, a score of 0.5, indicating that the LLM judges them to be equally good, is expected.

You can find more details about this in the source ().
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
@kapa.ai what if in example above score is 0? what does it mean?
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
A score of 0 in the PairwiseComparisonEvaluator means that the Language Learning Model (LLM) judges the second response (the reference) to be better than the first response (the one being evaluated).

In the context of the PairwiseComparisonEvaluator, the score represents the probability that the LLM judges the first response to be better than the second response. Therefore, a score of 0 means the LLM judges the first response to be worse in all cases when compared to the second response.

You can find more details about this in the source ().
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
what if score is 1?
@kapa.ai what if score is 1?
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
A score of 1 in the PairwiseComparisonEvaluator means that the Language Learning Model (LLM) judges the first response (the one being evaluated) to be better than the second response (the reference) in all cases.

In the context of the PairwiseComparisonEvaluator, the score represents the probability that the LLM judges the first response to be better than the second response. Therefore, a score of 1 means the LLM judges the first response to be superior in all cases when compared to the second response.

You can find more details about this in the source ().
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
Add a reply
Sign up and join the conversation on Discord